ill. (some col.), col. maps; "May 2005"--Cover; "NPS D-344A"--P. [4] of cover; Includes bibliographical references (p. 265-269) and index.
The purpose of this Final General Management Plan I Environmental Impact Statement for Crater Lake National Park is to present a direction for resource preservation and visitor use and a basic foundation for decision making for the park for the next 15 to 20 years. The general management plan provides a comprehensive direction for managing resource activities, visitor activities, and development that would be appropriate at the park in the future. An important element in determining the desired resource and visitor experience conditions for the park has been public participation. Many issues and concerns were identified by the general public and NPS staff as part of the initial planning efforts, and comments were solicited at public meetings, in planning newsletters, and on the internet. Once public input was received the planning team identified four alternatives for managing the park ?a no- action and three action alternatives, including the preferred alternative. The plan also analyzes and presents the environmental and socioeconomic impacts or consequences of implementing each of those alternatives ? the environmental impact statement part of this document. A summary of the alternatives and the important impacts is given below.
The purpose of this Final General Management Plan I Environmental Impact Statement for Crater Lake National Park is to present a direction for resource preservation and visitor use and a basic foundation for decision making for the park for the next 15 to 20 years. The general management plan provides a comprehensive direction for managing resource activities, visitor activities, and development that would be appropriate at the park in the future. An important element in determining the desired resource and visitor experience conditions for the park has been public participation. Many issues and concerns were identified by the general public and NPS staff as part of the initial planning efforts, and comments were solicited at public meetings, in planning newsletters, and on the internet. Once public input was received the planning team identified four alternatives for managing the park ?a no- action and three action alternatives, including the preferred alternative. The plan also analyzes and presents the environmental and socioeconomic impacts or consequences of implementing each of those alternatives ? the environmental impact statement part of this document. A summary of the alternatives and the important impacts is given below.